<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domainer Type-In Traffic Under Attack By Google&#8217;s Toolbar 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sempdx.org/blog/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Best Games</title>
		<link>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator>Best Games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sempdx.org/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/#comment-2496</guid>
		<description>I personally don&#039;t really like the idea because it can send you to a website you might not be looking for. I find just putting the name into the toolbar and choosing the one you want. I guess some people like the idea so it is kinda good. Great post btw always learning new things from you and I&#039;ve subscribed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally don&#8217;t really like the idea because it can send you to a website you might not be looking for. I find just putting the name into the toolbar and choosing the one you want. I guess some people like the idea so it is kinda good. Great post btw always learning new things from you and I&#8217;ve subscribed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sempdx.org/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>I’ve also seen the same exact thing happen to me before</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve also seen the same exact thing happen to me before</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sempdx.org/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>The browser bar traffic debate has been around for a very long time. It is a gray area of the net. I don&#039;t think there is a right or wrong answer. I&#039;ll take the traffic I get when they type in candy without the .com. Just because I own the .com version of candy does not mean it should be the default. I like it when it is, but I think I am out of my bounds to demand it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The browser bar traffic debate has been around for a very long time. It is a gray area of the net. I don&#8217;t think there is a right or wrong answer. I&#8217;ll take the traffic I get when they type in candy without the .com. Just because I own the .com version of candy does not mean it should be the default. I like it when it is, but I think I am out of my bounds to demand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Hancock</title>
		<link>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Hancock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sempdx.org/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen the same exact thing happen to me before</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen the same exact thing happen to me before</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sempdx.org/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>I honestly don&#039;t think that people ARE that smart, unfortunately, and the point is that it&#039;s another example of functionality that makes a determination that might be completely off-base.  This is happening in more places than the address bar and it&#039;s going to continue to be a major issue in search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly don&#8217;t think that people ARE that smart, unfortunately, and the point is that it&#8217;s another example of functionality that makes a determination that might be completely off-base.  This is happening in more places than the address bar and it&#8217;s going to continue to be a major issue in search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sempdx.org/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s definitely bad for domainers, but it puts even more weight into the #1 SERP position for each keyword. The #1 position is getting richer, while #2 and below are getting poorer.

I don&#039;t much like this solution they&#039;ve provided - your example proved a point. &quot;Oxford&quot; is the name of the town where the famous university is, and I would think a page about that (e.g. Wikipedia) would be better than going to the university home page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely bad for domainers, but it puts even more weight into the #1 SERP position for each keyword. The #1 position is getting richer, while #2 and below are getting poorer.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t much like this solution they&#8217;ve provided &#8211; your example proved a point. &#8220;Oxford&#8221; is the name of the town where the famous university is, and I would think a page about that (e.g. Wikipedia) would be better than going to the university home page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Coates</title>
		<link>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-1932</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Coates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sempdx.org/google/domainer-type-in-traffic-under-attack-by-googles-toolbar-5/#comment-1932</guid>
		<description>This may be something new to the Google Toolbar, but it&#039;s been the case on Firefox for as long as I can remember.  I find it useful.  People are generally smart enough to use the search bar for searching and the address bar for going to a specific site.  I doubt many people are going to be too upset about this other than domainers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be something new to the Google Toolbar, but it&#8217;s been the case on Firefox for as long as I can remember.  I find it useful.  People are generally smart enough to use the search bar for searching and the address bar for going to a specific site.  I doubt many people are going to be too upset about this other than domainers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
