<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEMpdx &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sempdx.org/blog/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sempdx.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:40:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Getting Into MS Live Should Not Be This Hard</title>
		<link>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/microsoft/getting-into-ms-live-should-not-be-this-hard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/microsoft/getting-into-ms-live-should-not-be-this-hard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hendison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[301 redirects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmaster center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xml sitemap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sempdx.org/microsoft/getting-into-ms-live-should-not-be-this-hard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>How hard should it be to get a site spidered and into Microsoft search index for a site that's over 3 years old, and has been in Google and Yahoo for years? Even if they won't follow my 301 redirect, don't you think that submitting an XML site map at Microsoft's Live Search Webmaster Tools would do the trick? The problem is that there's a 301 redirect from the main domain pointing to a subdirectory and admittedly, that's not the best way a site should be set up, but that's the way it was done, Read more [...]<p><a href="http://www.sempdx.org/blog/microsoft/getting-into-ms-live-should-not-be-this-hard/">Getting Into MS Live Should Not Be This Hard</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.sempdx.org">SEMpdx</a></p>
</p><p>The original post is titled <a href="http://www.sempdx.org/blog/microsoft/getting-into-ms-live-should-not-be-this-hard/">Getting Into MS Live Should Not Be This Hard</a> , and it came from <a href="http://www.sempdx.org">SEMpdx</a> . </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[How hard should it be to get a site spidered and into Microsoft search index  for a site that's over 3 years old, and has been in Google and Yahoo for years?

Even if they won't follow my 301 redirect, don't you think that submitting an XML site map at Microsoft's Live Search Webmaster Tools would do the trick?

The problem is that there's a 301 redirect from the main domain pointing to a subdirectory and admittedly, that's not the best way a site should be set up, but that's the way it was done, <a href="http://www.sempdx.org/blog/microsoft/getting-into-ms-live-should-not-be-this-hard/" class="more-link">Read more [...]</a><p>The original post is titled <a href="http://www.sempdx.org/blog/microsoft/getting-into-ms-live-should-not-be-this-hard/">Getting Into MS Live Should Not Be This Hard</a> , and it came from <a href="http://www.sempdx.org">SEMpdx</a> . </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sempdx.org/blog/microsoft/getting-into-ms-live-should-not-be-this-hard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

